Libertarians are not for the individual.

OK, if you have debated a libertarian you have no doubt heard this argument from them, “You collectivist, are such sheep, i am for the individual, and i am a free thinker.” Now before i would just roll my eyes, but it got me to thinking, are libertarians for the individual? Or is that just a talking point? I mean when you think about it, there is no such thing as an individual thought, you are gonna agree with someone, if you look at the word collective you it means to agree with people, well even the most unpopular stance, you will have a few people agreeing with you, so does an individual even exist? People people are unique, but our thinking may not be, because you can only have so many thoughts, and you will agree with someone about something.

Like the libertarian stance is i am for the individual to smoke pot no, you are for the collective of people who want to smoke pot, why legalize it for just one person? When you take a stance that even the majority, or the minority of a group of people are thinking alike on then you are not thinking individually, you are apart of a collective, let’s look at the definition of the word collective.

Now collective is when people agree on an individual topic, according to the free dictionary collective in politics can mean like a collective economy where everyone works together, for the better of society.
Collective also means for people to agree as a group on something, now this is impossible to have 100% agree on something. But when you have a majority then you have a collective thought.
From the encyclopedia brittanica:
individualism, political and social philosophy that emphasizes the moral worth of the individual. Although the concept of an individual may seem straightforward, there are many ways of understanding it, both in theory and in practice. The term individualism itself, and its equivalents in other languages, dates—like socialism and other isms—from the 19th century.

Now i know there is more to individualism than just the idea of the individual mattering. But it is at the heart of individualism, it is about the value that an individual is more important than the collective, but this is a fallacy, because when you have a group of people agree on a particular topic, then you have a collective thought. You would have to have a 0.0000000000001 out of 7 billion people to have a real individual thought, so it is impossible to have a real individual thought. This is another in the long line of fallacies in the libertarian line of thinking.

What the libertarian is really trying to say is, i want mine, and i am an individual, but when you agree like you go to your Ron Pawl rallies, then you are like the borg from Star Trek, TNG you are a collective, with the same type of thoughts, and beliefs.

From Brittanica, a poll showing that support for legalizing pot has risen to 45% one of the reasons is coming from the support of libertarians who are in 86% of libertarians support legalizing pot, so is that an individual thought? No, because 86% of libertarians agree! Gay marriage has gained support, and again good for them but 82% of libertarians support legalizing gay marriage, so how is that a thought for an individual?

It is this rebel without a cause attitude that libertarians have that makes them act like this, they want to act like they are a suppressed individual in a collective, no the 14% who disagree with you, are the ones who are the suppressed because they are in the minority, sorry but even in your libertarian utopian society, you will have someone who will hate your “free market” policies, guess what? You are suppressing them, and what they want. So this idea of you thinking that you are a lone ranger free thinker in a society of collective drones who follow the masses is just a talking point the fact is we are unique individuals, but our thoughts are that of a collective, get used to it. Even your heroes, Friedman, Hayek, Mises, and Rothbard where for collectivism, you just where made to think you are for the individual.


One thought on “Libertarians are not for the individual.

  1. Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin seo plugin

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s